To me, the word "imprint" refers to how and when we are acted on for the very first time in a profound enough way to dictate a pattern for years to come. Whether the first sexual imprint happens in solo masturbation or in mutual intercourse with another is a matter of debate. In my opinion, I think it is with sexual intercourse and I'll tell you why.
Take the first biological "safety vs. danger" imprint we all experience as an infant. Does it occur in the womb or in conjunction with the mother soon after we are born? I think the latter. Though we are all, for the most part, totally safe in the womb this does not and cannot assure anyone of a lifetime's confidence in the experience of safety. That assurance, or lack thereof, comes as the result of the mother/infant imprint during lactation, whether we were breastfed and the kind of physical and emotional environment we were born into.
Back to sex. The physical and emotional environment that accompanied our first intercourse orgasm sets a tone of conditions necessary for sexual arousal, satisfaction and pleasure. Ask yourself what the existing conditions were during that time and it may provide clues about the nature of your own sexual imprint.
If, for example, a sense of danger or fear accompanied the first sexual imprint then, conditions of danger or fear may be necessary for arousal. This does not mean that danger or fear are necessarily healthy conditions or those that you wsih to continue serving but that the sexual imprint is impersonal and continues as such until it is changed.
To change a sexual imprint is difficult but not impossible. It requires a period of abstinence from orgasm of any kind for at least thirty days, or one full lunar cycle. Sometimes it requires more time. Then, it requires experimentation with different conditions and settings, the ones you find more acceptable for reasons of your own. Remember, you can't fool or trick or force a new sexual imprint; eros is wise as a serpent.
There must be sustained celebacy to allow the old patterns and conditions to surface and then be denied so, that over time, they have no choice but to wither away. The slate must be cleaned, so to speak, before a new setting can be introduced and even then, there can be no forcing unless you wish "forcing" to be part of your new sexual imprint (not reccomended).
The deeper the blank slate, the deeper the imprint. Deepening the blank slate can occur through daily meditation throughout the celebacy or, if you can be very conscientious, with the assistance of psychoactive agents.
The first step, however, is identifying precisely what the initial conditions were surrounding your first sexual imprint. This critical knowledge will help you tell the difference between repeating yourself and serving something new.
Anyone else out there in Metaprogrammingland have anything to add to or question about the nature of the sexual imprint ?
Take the first biological "safety vs. danger" imprint we all experience as an infant. Does it occur in the womb or in conjunction with the mother soon after we are born? I think the latter. Though we are all, for the most part, totally safe in the womb this does not and cannot assure anyone of a lifetime's confidence in the experience of safety. That assurance, or lack thereof, comes as the result of the mother/infant imprint during lactation, whether we were breastfed and the kind of physical and emotional environment we were born into.
Back to sex. The physical and emotional environment that accompanied our first intercourse orgasm sets a tone of conditions necessary for sexual arousal, satisfaction and pleasure. Ask yourself what the existing conditions were during that time and it may provide clues about the nature of your own sexual imprint.
If, for example, a sense of danger or fear accompanied the first sexual imprint then, conditions of danger or fear may be necessary for arousal. This does not mean that danger or fear are necessarily healthy conditions or those that you wsih to continue serving but that the sexual imprint is impersonal and continues as such until it is changed.
To change a sexual imprint is difficult but not impossible. It requires a period of abstinence from orgasm of any kind for at least thirty days, or one full lunar cycle. Sometimes it requires more time. Then, it requires experimentation with different conditions and settings, the ones you find more acceptable for reasons of your own. Remember, you can't fool or trick or force a new sexual imprint; eros is wise as a serpent.
There must be sustained celebacy to allow the old patterns and conditions to surface and then be denied so, that over time, they have no choice but to wither away. The slate must be cleaned, so to speak, before a new setting can be introduced and even then, there can be no forcing unless you wish "forcing" to be part of your new sexual imprint (not reccomended).
The deeper the blank slate, the deeper the imprint. Deepening the blank slate can occur through daily meditation throughout the celebacy or, if you can be very conscientious, with the assistance of psychoactive agents.
The first step, however, is identifying precisely what the initial conditions were surrounding your first sexual imprint. This critical knowledge will help you tell the difference between repeating yourself and serving something new.
Anyone else out there in Metaprogrammingland have anything to add to or question about the nature of the sexual imprint ?
-
Re: the sexual imprint
Fri, December 23, 2005 - 3:02 AMThanks for sharing this, sherpa. I have been thinking on and off about these issues for quite a while now and specifically about the possibility of reprogramming one's sexual imprint and how it might be achieved.
I must admit that I remain unconvinced that intercourse is a prerequisite for imprinting. Personally I am inclined to believe that while it is more likely that a person will imprint during their first experience of intercourse, it is possible and perhaps even not uncommon for a person to imprint from a masturbatory experience, depending on the individual and their emotional circumstances. With regard to the analogy with the "safety vs. danger" imprint, i don't think that this is an entirely apt comparison as one's experiences in the womb, i feel, lack a *meaningful* possibility of danger from the child's pont of veiw. The safety vs. danger dichotomy is meaningful to a post-natal infant in a way in which it is not to one still in the womb, whereas the emotional prerequisites for a meaningfully sexual experience are much more ambiguous.
Personally I am still going through a process of excavating my own sociosexual pattern, separating the "objective" circumstances of the experience from the aspects of the experience which were significant both consciously and subconsciously, and working backwards from my, um. . . predilictions to the mental states which spawned them. Fascinating.
The process of re-imprinting you described should also prove interesting - it opens up a lot of possibilities. You have precisely answered a question which i never got around to asking! -
-
Re: the sexual imprint
Thu, February 16, 2006 - 7:44 PMYeah, I agree, from my experience intercourse isn't a prerequisite for the initial sexual imprint to form.
I imagine for many simply masturbation, or a 'near-sex experience'.
Any situation with enough emotional 'oomph' as well as a bit of a shock-factor that involves a strong flow of the sexual 'juices'.
I do like your suggestion for re-imprinting it, sherpa, thankyou for that.
As a side note, what about certain christians etc who don't have sex until they get married in their 30s? I imagine by that time their imprint must have formed, even if they never masturbated... perhaps for such people even a moment of lust could be enough to form an imprint.
-
-
Re: the sexual imprint
Sun, January 8, 2006 - 6:03 PMMy initial "imprint" came at the age of two in hospital, where I would spend the next nine years. I could tell you what happened if I thought that would help, she muses.
Su -
-
Re: the sexual imprint
Sun, January 8, 2006 - 6:06 PMNot sexual btw - just totally of the mind
-
